Plattform-Vergleich
| Plattform | JA-Quote | NEIN-Quote | Gebühr | KYC | Auszahlung | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (über Wettenprognose) Empfohlen polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
96% | 4% | 0 % (USDC on-chain) | Bis $1.500 ohne KYC | USDC, automatisch via UMA | Position eröffnen → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
96% | 4% | 0% | Geo-blockiert in DE/AT/CH | USDC, on-chain | Position eröffnen → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Bis 7 % pro Trade | US-only, KYC erforderlich | USD | Position eröffnen → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5 % Kommission | Vollständige KYC ab erstem Trade | GBP / EUR | Position eröffnen → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Spielgeld (mana) | Keine — Spielgeld | Mana (kein Cash-Out) | Position eröffnen → |
Ergebnis-Wahrscheinlichkeiten
Aktuelle marktimplizierte Wahrscheinlichkeit je Ergebnis aus dem Live-Orderbuch.
| Ergebnis | Wahrscheinlichkeit |
|---|---|
| O/U 32.5 | 96% |
| O/U 38.5 | 91% |
| 1Q O/U 3.5 | 91% |
| 1Q O/U 6.5 | 91% |
| 1Q O/U 9.5 | 91% |
| 1Q O/U 15.5 | 91% |
| 1Q O/U 12.5 | 89% |
| Georgia Tech O/U 19.5 | 85% |
| O/U 44.5 | 83% |
| O/U 30.5 | 79% |
| O/U 34.5 | 79% |
| O/U 36.5 | 79% |
| Stanford O/U 16.5 | 79% |
| O/U 40.5 | 77% |
| O/U 42.5 | 75% |
| O/U 48.5 | 74% |
| O/U 46.5 | 72% |
| Stanford O/U 19.5 | 70% |
| O/U 50.5 | 66% |
| 4Q O/U 7.5 | 63% |
| 1H O/U 27.5 | 61% |
| Georgia Tech vs. Stanford | 60% |
| O/U 52.5 | 60% |
| O/U 54.5 | 56% |
| 1H O/U 30.5 | 55% |
| 4Q Moneyline | 55% |
| Spread -2.5 | 54% |
| O/U 56.5 | 52% |
| 2Q O/U 16.5 | 52% |
| O/U 28.5 | 51% |
| 2Q O/U 7.5 | 51% |
| 2Q O/U 10.5 | 51% |
| Spread -24.5 | 50% |
| Spread -21.5 | 50% |
| Spread -18.5 | 50% |
| Spread -0.5 | 50% |
| Spread -0.5 | 50% |
| Spread -12.5 | 50% |
| 1H Spread -5.5 | 50% |
| 1H Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 1H Spread -0.5 | 50% |
| 1H Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 1H O/U 18.5 | 50% |
| 1H O/U 21.5 | 50% |
| 1H O/U 24.5 | 50% |
| 2H Spread -5.5 | 50% |
| 2H Spread -3.5 | 50% |
| 2H Spread -2.5 | 50% |
| 2H Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 2H Spread -0.5 | 50% |
| 2H Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 2H O/U 18.5 | 50% |
| 2H O/U 21.5 | 50% |
| 2H O/U 24.5 | 50% |
| 2H O/U 27.5 | 50% |
| 2H O/U 30.5 | 50% |
| 1Q Spread -3.5 | 50% |
| 1Q Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 1Q Spread -0.5 | 50% |
| 1Q Spread -0.5 | 50% |
| 1Q Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 1Q Spread -3.5 | 50% |
| 2Q Spread -5.5 | 50% |
| 2Q Spread -3.5 | 50% |
| 2Q Spread -2.5 | 50% |
| 2Q Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 2Q Spread -0.5 | 50% |
| 2Q Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 2Q O/U 13.5 | 50% |
| 2Q O/U 19.5 | 50% |
| 3Q Spread -5.5 | 50% |
| 3Q Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 3Q Spread -0.5 | 50% |
| 3Q Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 3Q O/U 3.5 | 50% |
| 3Q O/U 6.5 | 50% |
| 3Q O/U 9.5 | 50% |
| 3Q O/U 15.5 | 50% |
| 4Q Spread -5.5 | 50% |
| 4Q Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 4Q Spread -0.5 | 50% |
| 4Q Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech O/U 22.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech O/U 25.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech O/U 28.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech O/U 31.5 | 50% |
| Stanford O/U 22.5 | 50% |
| Stanford O/U 25.5 | 50% |
| Stanford O/U 28.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech 1H O/U 12.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech 1H O/U 14.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech 1H O/U 16.5 | 50% |
| Stanford 1H O/U 8.5 | 50% |
| Stanford 1H O/U 10.5 | 50% |
| Stanford 1H O/U 12.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech 2H O/U 11.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech 2H O/U 13.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech 2H O/U 15.5 | 50% |
| Stanford 2H O/U 9.5 | 50% |
| Stanford 2H O/U 11.5 | 50% |
| Stanford 2H O/U 13.5 | 50% |
| 2H Moneyline | 50% |
| Georgia Tech O/U 3.5 | 50% |
| Stanford O/U 2.5 | 50% |
| 1H Moneyline | 50% |
| 1Q Moneyline | 50% |
| 2Q Moneyline | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - 1H | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q2 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - 2H | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q4 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q1 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score Points - Q1 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q3 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score Points - Q3 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score Points - Q2 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score Points - Q4 | 50% |
| Game Goes to Overtime | 50% |
| Kickoff or Punt Return Touchdown | 50% |
| Pick-Six Scored | 50% |
| Georgia Tech vs. Stanford: Total Touchdowns O/U 4.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech vs. Stanford: Total Touchdowns O/U 6.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech vs. Stanford: Total Touchdowns O/U 5.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Passing Yards: O/U 200.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Passing Yards: O/U 225.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Passing Yards: O/U 250.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Passing Yards: O/U 225.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Passing Yards: O/U 200.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Rushing Yards: O/U 150.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Passing Yards: O/U 250.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Rushing Yards: O/U 125.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Rushing Yards: O/U 175.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Rushing Yards: O/U 125.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Rushing Yards: O/U 150.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 350.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Rushing Yards: O/U 175.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 400.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 350.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 375.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 400.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 375.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Stanford 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Stanford 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Field Goals Made: O/U 2.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Field Goals Made: O/U 2.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Receptions: O/U 14.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Receptions: O/U 19.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Receptions: O/U 14.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total Receptions: O/U 24.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Receptions: O/U 19.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total Receptions: O/U 24.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total First Downs: O/U 19.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total First Downs: O/U 21.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech Total First Downs: O/U 23.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total First Downs: O/U 19.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total First Downs: O/U 23.5 | 50% |
| Stanford Total First Downs: O/U 21.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech vs. Stanford: Total 4th Down Conversions O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech vs. Stanford: Total Successful Two-Point Conversions O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Georgia Tech vs. Stanford: Total Defensive/Special Teams Touchdowns O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| O/U 58.5 | 49% |
| Spread -1.5 | 48% |
| 4Q O/U 10.5 | 48% |
| 4Q O/U 13.5 | 48% |
| O/U 60.5 | 47% |
| Spread -3.5 | 45% |
| 4Q Spread -2.5 | 45% |
| 3Q Moneyline | 45% |
| Spread -4.5 | 42% |
| 4Q Spread -3.5 | 42% |
| 3Q Spread -2.5 | 40% |
| Spread -7.5 | 39% |
| Spread -6.5 | 39% |
| Spread -5.5 | 39% |
| 1H Spread -2.5 | 37% |
| 4Q O/U 16.5 | 37% |
| Spread -8.5 | 36% |
| O/U 64.5 | 34% |
| 3Q Spread -3.5 | 34% |
| 3Q O/U 12.5 | 34% |
| Spread -12.5 | 33% |
| Spread -14.5 | 32% |
| Spread -4.5 | 32% |
| O/U 66.5 | 32% |
| 4Q O/U 19.5 | 31% |
| Spread -2.5 | 29% |
| Spread -3.5 | 28% |
| O/U 62.5 | 28% |
| Spread -10.5 | 27% |
| Spread -9.5 | 27% |
| 1H Spread -3.5 | 27% |
| Spread -1.5 | 26% |
| Spread -6.5 | 25% |
| Spread -10.5 | 25% |
| O/U 68.5 | 25% |
| Spread -11.5 | 24% |
| Spread -9.5 | 23% |
| Spread -16.5 | 22% |
| Spread -13.5 | 21% |
| Spread -17.5 | 20% |
| Spread -20.5 | 14% |
Markt-Kontext
Der Prognosemarkt für „Prognose: Georgia Tech vs. Stanford" bewertet dieses Ergebnis derzeit mit 96% Ja-Wahrscheinlichkeit. In the upcoming college football game between Georgia Tech and Stanford, scheduled for September 26 at 10:30PM ET: This market will resolve to "Georgia Tech" if Georgia Tech win the game. This market …
Live-Daten & Statistiken
Live-Statistiken werden geladen, sobald das Spiel beginnt. Aktuelle Quoten sind oben verfügbar. Handelsvolumen: $279K.
Methodik dieser Bewertung
Wir tracken Prognose: Georgia Tech vs. Stanford auf den fünf Plattformen mit substanzieller Prediction-Market-Liquidität. Die angezeigte Wahrscheinlichkeit ist der Polymarket-Live-Mid; die Vergleichszeilen zeigen, wie jede Plattform den zugrundeliegenden Vertrag handhabt — Gebühren, KYC, Settlement, Einzahlungsmethoden. Die hervorgehobene Zeile markiert die günstigste Route in Polymarkets Orderbuch.
Auflösung & Auszahlung
Die Auflösung läuft on-chain. Polymarkets Vertragslogik trennt YES- und NO-Anteile als Conditional Tokens; bei Auflösung werden die richtigen Anteile zu 100¢ und die anderen zu 0¢. Die Outcome-Eingabe kommt vom UMA Optimistic Oracle, das mit einem Bond-System gegen falsche Auflösung absichert.
Sobald die Auflösung durch ist, hebt der Smart Contract alle gewinnenden Anteile zu USDC und schickt die Beträge an die Wallets der Inhaber. Das geschieht binnen Minuten der finalen Bestätigung — ohne Auszahlungsgebühren über die Polygon-Netzwerkkosten hinaus.
Häufige Fragen
- Wo kann ich diesen Markt am günstigsten handeln?
- Polymarket selbst ist global zugänglich, in DE/AT/CH allerdings geo-blockiert. Der einfachste Broker mit gleichem Orderbuch und 0 % Gebühr ist Wettenprognose. Kalshi nimmt bis zu 7 % pro Trade, Betfair Exchange 2-5 % Kommission auf Gewinne.
- Welche Gebühren fallen bei Polymarket an?
- Direkt am Polymarket-Orderbuch keine Gebühren — die einzigen Kosten sind Polygon-Netzwerkgebühren (typischerweise unter $0,01 pro Transaktion). Off-chain Plattformen wie Kalshi oder Betfair verlangen 2-7 % Kommission.
- Wie lange dauert eine USDC-Einzahlung?
- Auf Polygon werden Einzahlungen nach 12 Bestätigungen gutgeschrieben — in der Regel unter 30 Sekunden. Withdrawals folgen demselben Pfad und sind binnen Minuten auf Ihrer Wallet.
- Brauche ich KYC für diesen Markt?
- Auf Polymarket direkt nicht. Über vermittelnde Broker wie Wettenprognose ist KYC erst ab $1.500 lebenslangem Trading-Volumen erforderlich — darunter handeln Sie pseudonym mit nur einer Wallet-Adresse.
- Wie verlässlich sind die angezeigten Quoten?
- Die YES/NO-Prozentsätze sind die Live-Mid-Preise des Polymarket-Orderbuchs. Auf Märkten mit hoher Liquidität bewegen sich diese Werte sekündlich; bei dünneren Märkten sehen Sie kurze Plateaus.
%22%2F%3E%3Cpath%20d%3D%22M%206%2066%20A%2026%2026%200%200%201%2058%2066%22%20fill%3D%22%23E6B98D%22%20opacity%3D%220.9%22%2F%3E%3Ccircle%20cx%3D%2232%22%20cy%3D%2226%22%20r%3D%2222%22%20fill%3D%22%23F5CBA7%22%2F%3E%3Cpolygon%20points%3D%2216%2C18%2020%2C4%2024%2C18%22%20fill%3D%22%23be123c%22%2F%3E%3Cpolygon%20points%3D%2224%2C18%2028%2C3%2032%2C18%22%20fill%3D%22%23be123c%22%2F%3E%3Cpolygon%20points%3D%2232%2C18%2036%2C3%2040%2C18%22%20fill%3D%22%23be123c%22%2F%3E%3Cpolygon%20points%3D%2240%2C18%2044%2C4%2048%2C18%22%20fill%3D%22%23be123c%22%2F%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E){kind=small}
und%22%2F%3E%3Cpath%20d%3D%22M%206%2066%20A%2026%2026%200%200%201%2058%2066%22%20fill%3D%22%23E6B98D%22%20opacity%3D%220.9%22%2F%3E%3Ccircle%20cx%3D%2232%22%20cy%3D%2226%22%20r%3D%2222%22%20fill%3D%22%23F5CBA7%22%2F%3E%3Crect%20x%3D%2210%22%20y%3D%224%22%20width%3D%2244%22%20height%3D%2214%22%20rx%3D%227%22%20fill%3D%22%23be123c%22%20opacity%3D%220.9%22%2F%3E%3Crect%20x%3D%228%22%20%20y%3D%2218%22%20width%3D%228%22%20%20height%3D%2218%22%20rx%3D%224%22%20fill%3D%22%23be123c%22%20opacity%3D%220.7%22%2F%3E%3Crect%20x%3D%2248%22%20y%3D%2218%22%20width%3D%228%22%20%20height%3D%2218%22%20rx%3D%224%22%20fill%3D%22%23be123c%22%20opacity%3D%220.7%22%2F%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E){kind=small}
Jetzt „Prognose: Georgia Tech vs. Stanford" auf Wettenprognose handeln
Live-Orderbuch, 0 % Gebühren, USDC-Auszahlung in Sekunden.
Live-Markt öffnen →